<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tenth Amendment Center &#187; nafta</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/tag/nafta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com</link>
	<description>Concordia res Parvae Crescunt</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 02:30:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NAFTA Expansion &#8211; It&#8217;s Still Unconstitutional</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/10/01/nafta-expansion-its-still-unconstitutional/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/10/01/nafta-expansion-its-still-unconstitutional/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 17:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tenth Amendment</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Positive Grant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[10th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enumerated Powers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Executive Power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Founding Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free-trade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nafta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[power]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tenth-amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/10/01/nafta-expansion-its-still-unconstitutional/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[George Bush has formally presented an expansion of NAFTA to Peru. And, under FastTrack &#8220;rules,&#8221;Congress cannot amend the legislation.
What does this mean?  Well, it&#8217;s quite simple.  Under Fast Track, the president has the authority to ignore the will of Congress in negotiating new trade agreements.
We must remember that the US Constitution was written [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Bush has formally <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/09/20070927-14.html" target="_blank">presented an expansion of NAFTA to Peru.</a> And, under FastTrack &#8220;rules,&#8221;Congress cannot amend the legislation.</p>
<p>What does this mean?  Well, it&#8217;s quite simple.  Under Fast Track, the president has the authority to ignore the will of Congress in negotiating new trade agreements.<span id="more-54"></span></p>
<p>We must remember that the US Constitution was written under the principle of &#8220;positive grant.&#8221;  This means that the Federal Government is authorized to exercise <em>only </em>those powers that are specifically given to it by the Constitution.  Nothing more and nothing less.</p>
<p>This was so important to the founders that they codified it in law as the 10th Amendment:</p>
<p><em>&#8220;The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>There&#8217;s nothing, whatsoever, in the Constitution, which authorizes the president to create, conduct and/or conclude trade deals in this manner.  This authority resides with Congress.  Period.</p>
<p>Do I trust Congress to do a good job managing trade?  Absolutely not.  But, the potential for the abuse of power rises in proportion to how <em>few </em>the number of people have that power.</p>
<p>NAFTA is not free trade.  It&#8217;s never been free trade, and this new push by G.W. isn&#8217;t free trade either.</p>
<p>Likewise, it&#8217;s not Constitutional.  It never has been.  And this exercise of raw power by an individual &#8211; like Bush is doing and Congress has allowed &#8211; has nothing to do with the system of government that was created by the founding fathers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2007/10/01/nafta-expansion-its-still-unconstitutional/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
