The Missing Patent and the Health Care Debate
What does the original meaning of the “patent clause” have to do with health care and the Constitution? Paul Ballonoff explains.
Read moreWhat does the original meaning of the “patent clause” have to do with health care and the Constitution? Paul Ballonoff explains.
Read moreby Michael Boldin
A recent article in the New York Times covered the growth of state-level resistance to a future national health care plan. For example, in 2010, voters in Arizona will have a chance to approve a state constitutional amendment that would effectively ban national health care in that state. Legislators in Florida and Michigan [...]
For desperate people whose freedoms are being systematically usurped by all three federal branches and both political parties…
Read moreToday, a group of Georgia State Senators announced a plan to introduce a State Constitutional Amendment “Giving Georgians the right to choose whether they want to enroll in any health insurance plan and prohibiting governments from punishing those who decide not to participate.”
Read moreA major goal of our Constitution and Bill of Rights is to limit government power. National health care proposals would increase that power greatly.
Read moreAccording to Clinton Advisor and part-time professor, Paul Begala, if it isn’t politically possible for the feds to completely take over health care now, they should at least grab as much of it as they can.
Read moreOn the heels of a successful state-level resistance to the 2005 Real ID Act, activists and state legislators alike are focusing their efforts on state governments as a way to resist new federal programs. The latest? Health Care.
Read moreWrites Ron Paul: “Politicians can be very good at making it sound as if healthcare will be free for everybody. Nothing could be further from the truth.”
Read more