Firearms Freedom Act Legislation
Originally introduced and passed in Montana, the FFA declares that any firearms made and retained in-state are beyond the authority of Congress under its constitutional power to regulate commerce among the states. The FFA is primarily a Tenth Amendment challenge to the powers of Congress under the “commerce clause,” with firearms as the object. (source, FirearmsFreedomAct.com)
CLICK HERE – Firearms Freedom Act Talking Points from the Tenth Amendment Center.
(tri-fold brochure, printable in color or b/w, pdf format)
Legend: Blue – Introduced. Yellow – Passed one or more houses.
Red – Became Law. Black – Failed Vote.
I have d.w.i. convictions and can't own a gun in Texas.
You can own a gun in Texas with a DWI conviction, you just cant get a concealed handgun permit.
Carl,
You CAN own a gun in Texas with a DWI conviction, just as Wes said. And Wes is partially correct: you can’t get a concealed carry permit with a DWI conviction UNTIL FIVE YEARS HAVE PASSED SINCE YOUR CONVICTION. After five years, you’re good to go with the carry permit. Been there, done that.
Carl,
Just some further thoughts on the subject. You mention that you’ve had D.W.I. “convictions” (plural). If my understanding of the law is correct, after a certain number, any further D.W.I. conviction qualifies as a felony, after which you would be prohibited by federal law from owning a firearm ANYWHERE in the U.S. In that case, you are correct: you could not LEGALLY own a firearm in Texas, or anywhere else in this country. However, it is entirely your call as to whether or not that will actually deter you from carrying one. If you are so prohibited, but choose to carry a firearm anyway, and are threatened with arrest by a law enforcement officer, you may choose to refuse to relinquish your firearm, and invite the officer to take if from you. In my long experience, the vast majority of law enforcement officers would much rather finish their shifts for the day and go home to their wives and families than to engage you in a pistol fight. They want a pension, not a flag-draped coffin. The Second Amendment GUARANTEES you the right to KEEP (OWN) and BEAR (CARRY) ARMS! It doesn’t include any reference to D.W.I’s. I know this is a heck of a thing to say, but the time to stand up to tyranny is NOW! BETTER TO DIE ON YOUR FEET THAN LIVE ON YOUR KNEES! Just a thought.
Nicely said.
The "federal" government has Constitutional limits, we must enforce them, look at the definition of "State" in the law.
Clause 17: To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;–And
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 44 > § 921
2) The term “interstate or foreign commerce” includes commerce between any place in a State and any place outside of that State, or within any possession of the United States (not including the Canal Zone) or the District of Columbia, but such term does not include commerce between places within the same State but through any place outside of that State. The term “State” includes the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the possessions of the United States (not including the Canal Zone).
most all the bad guys are fellons, and thay all cary guns..i would rather be judged by 12 than carried by 6 ..
I had a feleny dui in Michigan of 2000. The state reinstated gun rjghts in 2003 now 2010 ATF has stepped in and took away all rights. looking for some direction to go with this please.
The resolutions and bills are encouraging, but I have one question: What teeth does the TN and MT laws have for enforcement? What teeth do any of the other resolutions or bills have? How do any of the states enforce their law when the Feds show up to enforce Federal law? Are they going to have the county Sheriff slap the cuffs on the Fed, or escort him back to the airport or back across the state line? All resolutions and bills that do not provide for stiff enforcement against Washington are destined to be challenged or ignored by the Feds.
Well, you do have a point. I think arresting and processing a federal agent for violating state law would be just as easy as anyone else with a gun. But finding the lawyers, judges, and sheriff/police to back up the state's rights would be quite a task.
I am ashamed that my state(Mississippi) isn't doing more to resist the lawlessness of the federal government.
This is a healthy sign. Legislators in several states working to take back sovereignty and restore Constitutional government. The next step that has to be taken is to replace Representatives and Senators who don't support states rights. Then, the House needs to introduce impeachment proceedings against Supreme Court Justices who exhibit bad behavior. Contrary to popular belief, Supreme Court Justices do not serve lifetime appointments. They serve for periods of GOOD BEHAVIOR. I contend that erroneous decisions constitute bad behavior.
You can rest assured we will be tested by the federalies and the jack booted thugs of the atf. The atf is not, I repeat is not under oath to the CONSTITUTION. They are a ROGUE group used to usurp local AUTHORITY and subvert THESE PEOPLE OF THE united STATES. Have talked with them, questioned their loyalties in an open forum. ASKED them straight out if Representatives gave them orders against the CONSTITUTION would they do it? answer is YES. They are the SS of the NWO. Be sure that this war is in it’s infancy and there will be numerous battles. These criminals will not just roll over and give up their stolen acquisitions easily. They intend to subvert and subjugate the population by force. Resistance should be from conviction from our part, not just hey I’m a week end warrior. This is going to be for the long haul.As our challenge grows to their usurpation and the criminals feel threatened, they will choose their test case to see if they will fold. Oklahoma looks likely. We need to stand by them and if necessary go there to physically support their efforts. Consider what is being said here. This has happenned before in past history. Can get ugly or diificult.
Anyone remember the History of the UNCIVIL WAR. District of Criminals hates being challenged. That’s part of the reason for the 5th Army being started by Bush and strengthened by butt head. There are battles ahead, count the costs and consider your contribution level you are willing to expend. How much do you value your freedom ? It may take all we have to eventually see this out to it’s end.
Not to burst your bubble, Brian; but ATF agents DO take the traditional Oath to “protect and defend the Constitution.” I wonder what happened to “preserve”? I’m not advocating one way or another with respect to the plethora of issues you present; but this movement must depend on Truth as its foundation. That means that there is the POTENTIAL that you may find your local ATF agent a friend – IF he takes his Oath seriously – which many do. Your presentation largely eliminates that possibility. Let’s rely on Truth rather than creating monsters that might not be there. Friends are good, no?
Those with States convictions can easily regain firearms rights. The problem is with federal convictions.There are no avenues to ever regain firearms rights after a federal conviction no matter how minor it is or how old it is. There is bill in Congress named "Second Chance for non-violent offenders" but has died on the table of those skunks at the House Judiciary Committee without any consideration. Has been introduced and re-introduced by Congressman Charles Rangel of NY for the past ten years. It's not fair that States can offer expungements,other civil rights restorations but not the federal government.
There is more information on this site:http://www.usapoliticaltyranny.info
It is a shared understanding by reasonably people that one should be able to possess a firearm for self-defense.