<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Enumerated Powers of States</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/</link>
	<description>Working to limit the power of the federal government</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:26:34 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Missouri House Passes Heath Care Freedom Act &#124; Franklin County Patriots</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-308794</link>
		<dc:creator>Missouri House Passes Heath Care Freedom Act &#124; Franklin County Patriots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 14:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-308794</guid>
		<description>[...] The founders, during the time of the Constitution’s ratification, made clear that a vast majority of regulatory powers would be left in the states – including social services, agriculture, mining, and more. Click here to read more. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The founders, during the time of the Constitution’s ratification, made clear that a vast majority of regulatory powers would be left in the states – including social services, agriculture, mining, and more. Click here to read more. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Opps...Looks like the States are Telling barry - Expedite Trucking Forums</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-308690</link>
		<dc:creator>Opps...Looks like the States are Telling barry - Expedite Trucking Forums</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 04:59:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-308690</guid>
		<description>[...]  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10th Amendment 101: Essential Reading for Tenthers&#160;&#124;&#160;California Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-306730</link>
		<dc:creator>10th Amendment 101: Essential Reading for Tenthers&#160;&#124;&#160;California Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-306730</guid>
		<description>[...] Enumerated Powers of States [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Enumerated Powers of States [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Liberty Voice &#187; Lead Story &#187; On the Constitution, Beware the Word “Clearly”</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-303362</link>
		<dc:creator>The Liberty Voice &#187; Lead Story &#187; On the Constitution, Beware the Word “Clearly”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 03:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-303362</guid>
		<description>[...] the federal government would be too powerful, the Constitution’s advocates provided voters with lists of specific activities that would remain under exclusive state control. Among these were business regulation (other than foreign, interstate, and Indian commerce) and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the federal government would be too powerful, the Constitution’s advocates provided voters with lists of specific activities that would remain under exclusive state control. Among these were business regulation (other than foreign, interstate, and Indian commerce) and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Constitution, Beware the Word &#8220;Clearly&#8221; &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-303153</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Constitution, Beware the Word &#8220;Clearly&#8221; &#124; The Ruthless Truth blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 22:52:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-303153</guid>
		<description>[...] the federal government would be too powerful, the Constitution’s advocates provided voters with lists of specific activities that would remain under exclusive state control. Among these were business regulation (other than foreign, interstate, and Indian commerce) and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the federal government would be too powerful, the Constitution’s advocates provided voters with lists of specific activities that would remain under exclusive state control. Among these were business regulation (other than foreign, interstate, and Indian commerce) and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Constitution, Beware the Word “Clearly”&#160;&#124;&#160;Florida Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-302984</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Constitution, Beware the Word “Clearly”&#160;&#124;&#160;Florida Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:16:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-302984</guid>
		<description>[...] the federal government would be too powerful, the Constitution’s advocates provided voters with lists of specific activities that would remain under exclusive state control. Among these were business regulation (other than foreign, interstate, and Indian commerce) and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the federal government would be too powerful, the Constitution’s advocates provided voters with lists of specific activities that would remain under exclusive state control. Among these were business regulation (other than foreign, interstate, and Indian commerce) and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: On the Constitution, Beware the Word &#8220;Clearly&#8221;&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-302893</link>
		<dc:creator>On the Constitution, Beware the Word &#8220;Clearly&#8221;&#160;&#124;&#160;Tenth Amendment Center</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-302893</guid>
		<description>[...] the federal government would be too powerful, the Constitution’s advocates provided voters with lists of specific activities that would remain under exclusive state control. Among these were business regulation (other than foreign, interstate, and Indian commerce) and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the federal government would be too powerful, the Constitution’s advocates provided voters with lists of specific activities that would remain under exclusive state control. Among these were business regulation (other than foreign, interstate, and Indian commerce) and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Minority Twice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; They Can’t Push Us Around Forever</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-301146</link>
		<dc:creator>Minority Twice &#187; Blog Archive &#187; They Can’t Push Us Around Forever</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 14:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-301146</guid>
		<description>[...] are clear limits to the power of the federal government and clear realms of power for the states.  However, the simple and clear expression of purpose, to secure our natural rights, has evolved [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are clear limits to the power of the federal government and clear realms of power for the states.  However, the simple and clear expression of purpose, to secure our natural rights, has evolved [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Federal Involvement In Health Care Is Unconstitutional! &#171; Political Vel Craft</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-297248</link>
		<dc:creator>Federal Involvement In Health Care Is Unconstitutional! &#171; Political Vel Craft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 03:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-297248</guid>
		<description>[...] I have now spent nearly twenty-years of my life researching and publishing scholarly studies on the Founding-Era record, and I have found no significant evidence that those who wrote and ratified the Constitution thought federal power would extend to health care. Quite the contrary: When the Constitution was being promoted to the public, one of the big selling points was that regulation of all such matters would remain exclusively with the states. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have now spent nearly twenty-years of my life researching and publishing scholarly studies on the Founding-Era record, and I have found no significant evidence that those who wrote and ratified the Constitution thought federal power would extend to health care. Quite the contrary: When the Constitution was being promoted to the public, one of the big selling points was that regulation of all such matters would remain exclusively with the states. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Are Federal Health Insurance Mandates Constitutional? &#171; Dancing Czars</title>
		<link>http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/2009/10/08/enumerated-powers-of-states/comment-page-1/#comment-296538</link>
		<dc:creator>Are Federal Health Insurance Mandates Constitutional? &#171; Dancing Czars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 19:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tenthamendmentcenter.com/?p=3337#comment-296538</guid>
		<description>[...] I have now spent nearly twenty-years of my life researching and publishing scholarly studies on the Founding-Era record, and I have found no significant evidence that those who wrote and ratified the Constitution thought federal power would extend to health care. Quite the contrary: When the Constitution was being promoted to the public, one of the big selling points was that regulation of all such matters would remain exclusively with the states. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have now spent nearly twenty-years of my life researching and publishing scholarly studies on the Founding-Era record, and I have found no significant evidence that those who wrote and ratified the Constitution thought federal power would extend to health care. Quite the contrary: When the Constitution was being promoted to the public, one of the big selling points was that regulation of all such matters would remain exclusively with the states. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
